Study Reveals Low-Income Housing Does Not Affect Local Property Values

A new study by Trulia shatters the assumption that affordable housing is bad for the neighborhood.

By Annette Barlow December 15, 2016

Some things in real estate are absolutes. Location is everything, the worst house on the best street is a sure-fire investment, and low-income housing projects decrease the value of their surrounding neighborhoods. Right?

Well, according to a new study conducted by Trulia, the assumption that affordable housing units negatively impact their neighboring areas is, in fact, false. Focusing on America’s 20 most expensive housing markets, the study looked at 3,083 low-income housing projects completed between 1996 and 2006, and the effect of their construction on the values of nearby homes. The conclusion? “With a few exceptions, the presence of low-income housing seems to have had no impact,” throwing a spanner in the works of widely accepted real estate lore.

RelatedThis Bushwick Apartment Building Is Remodeled After NYC Subway

Rather than simply reassuring potential buyers that local low-income projects won’t tank their future investments, this revelation could actually go some way to establishing increased opportunities for new affordable housing units. It’s no secret that in the country’s least affordable markets there is often significant resistance to the construction of low-income housing units, based on the very assumption that this study eradicates. With statistical evidence to back up countering ideology, government initiatives and construction firms have a larger and more stable arsenal with which to ward off local dissenters.

So, how did Trulia’s economists reach this conclusion? They compared median price per square foot of homes within 2,000 feet of low-income housing projects with that of homes farther away—2,001 to 4,000 square feet—built over a 20-year period. Covering the decades before and after each housing project was built, the study comprised projects funded by the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program abd administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. En masse, homes nearby and homes farther away from the projects increased in value at the same rate.

RelatedFacebook Will Give $20 Million To Tackle Affordable Housing Crisis In Silicon Valley

There are, however, always exceptions to the rule: In Boston and Cambridge, Mass., nearby home values decreased by $18 and $19 per square foot respectively, while in Denver, nearby homes actually increased by $7.35 per square foot. There could be a number of reasons why both increase and decrease occurred, but the most convincing is that in both Boston and Cambridge, the housing projects included in the study were already located in areas dense with low-income and affordable housing. If these area’s demographics and housing populations changed little over the 20-year period, this would explain the lack of nearby value increase. Similarly, the area in which Denver’s low-income projects are situated is likely to have undergone a regeneration, transforming from low-income neighborhood to in-demand, “cool” locale. Hence the increase in value.

So how can this study actually make an impact on the low-housing market? Naming and shaming could be the most powerful tenet of Trulia’s report, revealing as they did that San Jose is the most aggressive in adding low-incoming housing units (7.81 per 1,000 people) while Oakland added the fewest units per capita (0.52 per 1,000 residents).

Annette Barlow



Annette is freelance editor, sub-editor, journalist and proofreader with a fierce love of all things feminist, food and music. She is a regular fixture on the arts, culture and feature desks at The Guardian, and her words have appeared on NME, Great British Chefs, The Fly, The Line of Best Fit and Australian Times.

    Avocado toasts are the reason why millennials can’t afford a home, says one Australian real estate developer. #AvocadoToast #Millennials
    Five years on since Superstorm Sandy, Queens’ coastal peninsula is in the midst of a development boom. #Development #Rockaways
    It turns out, renters can’t get enough of good ol’ no-doorman-no-frills apartments. Too bad developers aren’t building any. #Doorman #LuxuryRentals
Developers Jump Aboard The Trend To Revamp Transit Hubs And Remake Cities
Never has the often used marketing term, “close to transportation” been more important when attracting home buyers. These days it’s not just homes that are…
Millennials Are Fueling The Current Sizzling Real Estate Market
Ever wondered why the hosts of home improvement shows seem to be getting progressively younger, along with the fresh-faced couples getting their new properties made…
The Best Cities For Recent Grads To Rent – Without Blowing Their Entire Paycheck
What’s next post graduation? For most, the logical answer is to find a job. After the excitement of finishing your studies and the big celebration,…
Luxury Knows No Limit In Malaysia As A Deluge Of New Developments Hit The Market
The amount of newly constructed high-end real estate in Malaysia is almost as abundant as the lush vegetation which covers the tropical landscape. Despite vacant…
Don’t Call It A Commune – Upscale Co-Living Is Attracting Major Development
What may have once been referred to as a commune is today termed a co-living space. The big news that it’s not hippies with hemp…
It’s Official—New York Is Now The Most Expensive City In The World To Build
As if you didn’t already know, it’s expensive to build in New York City. Not just expensive but now officially the most expensive place in…
An Ultimate Destination For The Most Comprehensive Real Estate Data, Agorafy Prepares To Launch Nationwide
In the coming days, Agorafy will be entering a new chapter. It is the beginning of a new growth cycle in real estate technology with…
A New Beach Front Condo Building Slated For the Rockaways Amid A Slew Of New Development
Proving that New Yorkers are the masters of reinvention, particularly when it comes to real estate, a new millennial-friendly condo tower is due to rise…

TOP 10